Which term refers to facts that suggest an offence has occurred?

The correct term that refers to facts suggesting that an offense has occurred is circumstantial evidence. This type of evidence consists of indirect proof that requires reasoning to connect it to the conclusion that a crime was committed. It can include a variety of circumstances surrounding a case that, when taken together, can imply or indicate that a criminal act has taken place, even if it does not directly prove the offense itself.

Indictable offenses and non-indictable offenses refer to the classification of crimes within the legal system. Indictable offenses are serious crimes that can lead to more severe penalties and typically require a formal charge or indictment to prosecute. Non-indictable offenses are lesser offenses that may be pursued without a formal indictment. These classifications do not address the concept of evidence suggesting a crime has occurred.

Testimonial evidence refers to statements made by witnesses under oath about what they have seen, heard, or experienced, which is also not the same as circumstantial evidence. Thus, while testimonial evidence is critical in many cases, it does not specifically refer to facts indicative of an offense, making circumstantial evidence the most appropriate answer in this context.